Writer E. Jean Carroll has received the roughly $5.6 million a jury said Donald Trump owed her, after a court released the damages that had been held while he appealed. The payment closes one long chapter of a civil case that began years ago, when a Manhattan jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the 1990s and then defaming her by denying it.
How the Case Started
Carroll, a longtime advice columnist, first went public with her account in 2019, writing that Trump had assaulted her in the dressing room of a Manhattan department store decades earlier. Trump denied the encounter ever happened and questioned her credibility, which opened the door to the defamation claims that followed.
In 2023, a federal civil jury in New York concluded that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and for defaming Carroll. The jury awarded her roughly $5 million in damages. Trump has consistently denied the allegations and vowed to overturn the verdict on appeal.
Why the Money Was Frozen
When a losing party appeals a civil judgment, the money owed is often placed into a court-controlled account rather than paid out immediately. That is what happened here. The damages sat in escrow, untouched, while Trump pursued every available challenge to the verdict.
With those appeals now exhausted, the court released the funds to Carroll. The total came to about $5.6 million — the original award plus the interest that accumulated during the extended legal fight to overturn it.
A Separate, Larger Judgment Still Pending
This payout is distinct from a second case Carroll brought against Trump. In that matter, a different jury ordered Trump to pay $83.3 million for additional defamatory statements he made about her. That far larger award remains tied up in the appeals process and has not been paid.
Taken together, the two cases represent one of the most significant civil liabilities any former president has faced. The $5.6 million now in Carroll’s hands is notable precisely because it is one of the few such judgments against Trump to actually be collected in full.
What This Means for Readers
For most people, the mechanics of a civil judgment rarely make headlines. But this case is a reminder of how the process works: a jury reaches a verdict, the losing side can appeal, and the money can remain frozen for years before anyone actually receives it. When the appeals run out, the judgment stands and the funds are released.
For Carroll, the payment brings a measure of finality to a dispute that has stretched on for years. For Trump, it marks one of the rare instances in which a civil judgment against him has moved all the way from verdict to full payment.
Stay informed on the stories that matter most. Follow Palmedia News on Facebook and bookmark palmedianews.com for breaking news and analysis.